Home · Questions and games for couples
The 36 Questions to Fall in Love: The Full List, the Study, and How Couples Use Them
adoree Ask me in one tap
Key takeaways
- The 36 questions come from Aron, Melinat, Aron, Vallone and Bator (1997), published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. The study is about closeness between strangers, not love.
- The procedure is three sets of 12, about 15 minutes each, with both people answering every question and taking turns going first.
- Mandy Len Catron's 2015 Modern Love essay in The New York Times made the list famous and added four minutes of eye contact, which is not in the 1997 paper.
- Later research backs the core idea: the questions build more closeness than small talk, work as well over video chat as face to face, and can lift passion in long-term couples.
- For a long-term couple, the trick is to guess your partner's answer before they give it. You learn how current your picture of them is.

The short version
The 36 questions to fall in love are a research procedure, not a magic spell. In 1997, psychologist Arthur Aron and four colleagues published a way to create closeness between two strangers in 45 minutes: three sets of 12 questions, each set more personal than the last, with both people answering every one. Pairs who did it felt closer than pairs who made small talk.
The questions became famous in 2015, when a New York Times essay showed what happened when a writer tried them on a date. Below you'll find all 36, what the study actually found, how to do them, and how to use them if you've been together for years.
| Set | What it covers | Time in the study | Feels like |
|---|---|---|---|
| Set I (1 to 12) | Dinner guests, a perfect day, gratitude, your life story | About 15 minutes | A good first date |
| Set II (13 to 24) | Dreams, memories, friendship, family | About 15 minutes | A long walk with a friend |
| Set III (25 to 36) | "We" statements, what you like about each other, regrets | About 15 minutes | 2 a.m. honesty |
Where the 36 questions came from
The 36 questions come from a paper by Arthur Aron, Edward Melinat, Elaine Aron, Robert Vallone and Renee Bator, "The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness", in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin in 1997. The goal was a reliable way to make strangers feel close in a lab, so researchers could study closeness.
Here's how the study worked:
- Who: students in psychology classes, paired with someone they didn't know.
- How: each pair got three sets of slips. They took turns reading a slip aloud, and both answered, the reader first.
- Timing: about 15 minutes per set, 45 minutes in total. Pairs were told it didn't matter whether they finished.
- The comparison: other pairs got small-talk slips instead, such as describing the last time they walked for more than an hour.
In the first study, the closeness pairs rated their closeness at 4.06 on average against 3.25 for the small-talk pairs, a large effect by psychology standards. The authors noted that after 45 minutes, the average pair felt about as close as the 30th percentile of how students rated the closest relationship in their lives.
Two details get lost in the retelling. First, the later studies in the paper found that matching people on shared attitudes, telling them their partner would probably like them, or making closeness an explicit goal made no significant difference. The questions did the work. Second, the romance. An earlier, longer version of the procedure produced anecdotes of lasting bonds, "including one pair who married!" as the authors put it. That's one pair. The study measured closeness, never love.
The Modern Love essay that made them famous
In January 2015, writer Mandy Len Catron published a Modern Love essay in The New York Times called "To Fall in Love With Anyone, Do This." She and an acquaintance worked through the 36 questions, then stood on a bridge at midnight and stared into each other's eyes for four minutes. They fell in love. In an interview with Hazlitt about her later book, How to Fall in Love with Anyone, she said that when people asked whether they were still together, the answer was yes.
The essay drew more than eight million views in its first month, Catron said in her TEDx talk, "Falling in love is the easy part". In the same talk she made the point the internet skipped: they were in love because they each chose to be, and staying in love means choosing it again.
One correction worth knowing. The four minutes of eye contact is not in the 1997 paper. The published procedure is the 36 questions alone, and Catron herself has said the version with eye contact was never published. You can add it. You don't need it.
The 36 questions that lead to love, in three sets
These are the 36 questions to fall in love in the order of the original study. They're written here in our own words, kept close to the meaning of each one. The original wording is in the appendix of the 1997 paper. Take turns reading, and both answer every question.
Set I: getting comfortable
- If you could have anyone in the world over for dinner, who would you pick?
- Do you want to be famous? Famous for what?
- Do you ever rehearse what you'll say before you make a phone call? Why?
- What would your perfect day look like?
- When did you last sing to yourself? And to someone else?
- If you'd live to 90 and could keep either the mind or the body of a 30-year-old for the last 60 years, which would you choose?
- Do you have a private hunch about how you'll die?
- Name three things you and your partner seem to have in common.
- What in your life are you most grateful for?
- If you could change one thing about how you were raised, what would it be?
- Take four minutes to tell your partner your life story, in as much detail as you can.
- If you could wake up tomorrow with one new quality or ability, what would you want it to be?
Set II: going deeper
- If a crystal ball could tell you the truth about anything (yourself, your life, the future), what would you ask it?
- Is there something you've dreamed about doing for a long time? What has stopped you?
- What's the greatest thing you've ever accomplished?
- What do you value most in a friendship?
- What memory do you treasure most?
- What's your worst memory?
- If you knew you would die suddenly in a year, would you change how you're living now? Why?
- What does friendship mean to you?
- What part do love and affection play in your life?
- Take turns naming something you see as a good quality in your partner, five each.
- How close and warm is your family? Do you think your childhood was happier than most people's?
- How do you feel about your relationship with your mother?
Set III: the closest of all
- Make three true "we" statements each, such as "We are both in this room feeling..."
- Finish this sentence: "I wish I had someone I could share..."
- If you were going to become close friends with your partner, what would be important for them to know about you?
- Tell your partner what you like about them. Be very honest, and say things you might not say to someone you just met.
- Tell your partner about an embarrassing moment in your life.
- When did you last cry in front of someone? And on your own?
- Tell your partner something you already like about them.
- Is anything too serious to joke about? What?
- If you died tonight without a chance to talk to anyone, what would you most regret not having said, and to whom? Why haven't you said it yet?
- Your home catches fire with everything you own inside. Your loved ones and pets are safe, and you have time for one last run to save a single item. What do you grab, and why?
- Of everyone in your family, whose death would hit you hardest? Why?
- Share a personal problem and ask how your partner would handle it. Then ask them to reflect back how you seem to feel about it.
How to do the 36 questions
The original instructions were simple, and they still work for anyone looking for questions to ask to fall in love, or to fall back in love. Most couples who say "it didn't work" skipped one of these.
| Rule | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Go in order, no skipping | The slow climb is the method. Set III lands because Sets I and II came first. |
| Both of you answer every question | Closeness comes from trading, not interviewing. |
| Take turns going first | Nobody gets to hide behind always answering second. |
| About 15 minutes per set | Gives you permission to linger. Finishing doesn't matter. |
| Phones in another room | Every glance at a screen resets the climb. |
| Eye contact at the end (optional) | Catron's addition. Start with one minute if four feels like a lot. |
Pick a night without a deadline. A long dinner, a drive, or a walk works better than sitting across a desk. In Delhi, a winter afternoon in one of these places for couples in Delhi gives you both the walk and the quiet. If one of you gets emotional in Set III, stay on that question. That's the procedure working.
How to do the 36 questions as a long-term couple
The questions were built for strangers, so a couple who's been together for years needs one change: guess before you hear. Before your partner answers, say what you think they'll say. Then listen to what they actually say.
You'll be right a lot in Set I. You'll be wrong more often than you expect in Sets II and III, because people change and the picture we hold of a partner tends to freeze around the time we got serious. Every wrong guess is something new to learn about a person you thought you had memorized.
A few more tweaks for couples who've been together a while:
- Answer as you are now. For questions like 4 and 14, add "and what would I have said when we met?"
- Split it over three nights. One set per night keeps it from feeling like homework.
- Do Set III somewhere new. In a 2000 study by Aron and colleagues, couples who did a novel and exciting task together for seven minutes reported bigger gains in relationship quality than couples who did a mundane one. A new place counts.
- Try a double date. In a 2014 study from Keith Welker, Richard Slatcher, Aron and colleagues, couples who did a high-disclosure version of these questions with another couple reported more passionate love for their own partner afterward, according to Wayne State University's summary, especially when the other couple responded warmly.
| Your situation | How to use the list |
|---|---|
| First few dates | As written, in order, ideally in one sitting |
| Dating a few months | As written, then talk about which answer surprised you |
| Together for years | Guess first, then answer; one set per night |
| Long distance | Over video chat, one set per call |
| Feeling disconnected | Start with Set III, questions 28 and 31 only |
Do the 36 questions really work? What newer research says
Short answer: yes for closeness, unproven for love. Later studies keep finding that structured, escalating self-disclosure brings people closer than small talk. None of them show the questions can make two incompatible people fall in love, and the original pairs were students in a classroom study, so treat the romance as a happy side effect, not a promise.
What the newer research adds:
- The effect holds up. In 2021, researcher Susan Sprecher compared Aron's closeness task with his small-talk task and with an unstructured getting-to-know-you chat. The 36 questions produced more closeness and other positive outcomes, especially compared with small talk.
- Video works. In the same study, pairs met either face to face or over video chat, and the mode made no significant difference. That's good news for long-distance couples.
- It can help long-term couples too. The Welker study above suggests the closeness spills over into passion for your own partner.
- We fear deep talk more than we should. Across a series of experiments, Kardas, Kumar and Epley (2022) found people overestimate how awkward deep conversations will be and underestimate how much the other person cares. The hard part of the 36 questions is starting.
Turn the 36 questions into a game
If reading a list across the table feels stiff, play it instead. Answering separately and revealing together takes the pressure off, because neither of you has to watch the other's face mid-answer.
That's how the couple games inside Adoree work. Adoree is an AI relationship assistant that each of you talks to privately, by voice or text, and it has 12 couple games built in, picked for you two. Each of you plays on your own phone, and the answers reveal only once you've both answered. Then Adoree adds a short note on what your answers say about the two of you. Firsts, 2035 and The Unsent Text carry the same spirit as Set III in a lighter shape. The games need a connected partner. You can read more about the people behind Adoree.
Finished all 36? Keep going with these deep questions to ask your partner, sorted by theme and depth. For a lighter night, try our never have I ever questions for couples. Every list we have lives in the questions and games hub.
Frequently asked questions
What are the 36 questions to fall in love?
They are 36 prompts from a 1997 study by psychologist Arthur Aron and colleagues, split into three sets of 12. Set I is light (a dream dinner guest, a perfect day), Set II goes deeper (treasured and painful memories, family), and Set III is the most personal (what you like about each other, regrets, a problem you need help with).
Do the 36 questions really make you fall in love?
Not reliably. The original study measured closeness between strangers, and pairs who did the questions felt closer than pairs who made small talk. The authors mention one pair from an earlier version of the procedure who later married, but the study never tested romance. The questions build closeness. Love needs more than one evening.
How long do the 36 questions take?
In the study, each set got about 15 minutes, so 45 minutes in total, and pairs were told not to worry about finishing. At home, give yourselves longer: most couples want to linger, and there is no prize for finishing fast.
Do you have to do the four minutes of eye contact?
No. The eye contact comes from Mandy Len Catron's 2015 Modern Love essay, not from the 1997 paper, whose procedure is the 36 questions alone. Many couples like ending with it anyway. If four minutes feels like a lot, start with one.
Can married couples do the 36 questions?
Yes. Long-term couples tend to get the most from guessing each other's answers first, then hearing the real one. A 2014 study by Welker and colleagues found couples who did a version of these questions with another couple reported a rise in passionate love for their own partner.
Can you do the 36 questions over video chat?
Yes. A 2021 study by Susan Sprecher randomly assigned new pairs to meet face to face or by video chat. The closeness task built more closeness than small talk either way, and the mode of communication made no significant difference. That makes the list a solid long-distance date.
Play it on two phones, reveal together.
Adoree has 12 couple games built in, picked for you two. Each of you answers on your own phone, the answers reveal once you've both played, and Adoree adds a note about what they say about you.
Talk to Adoree →Ask Adoree
You just read about it. Now tell me yours — I'll tell you what it's really about.
More on this: Questions and games for couples, every guide in one place →
References
- The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness: A Procedure and Some Preliminary Findings. Aron, Melinat, Aron, Vallone and Bator, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(4), 363-377 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297234003
- Closeness and other affiliative outcomes generated from the Fast Friends procedure. Sprecher, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 38(5), 1452-1471 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521996055
- Effects of self-disclosure and responsiveness between couples on passionate love within couples. Welker, Baker, Padilla, Holmes, Aron and Slatcher, Personal Relationships 21(4), 692-708 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12058
- Couples' shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Aron, Norman, Aron, McKenna and Heyman, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(2), 273-284 (2000). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10707334/
- Overly Shallow?: Miscalibrated Expectations Create a Barrier to Deeper Conversation. Kardas, Kumar and Epley, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 122(3) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000281